0


以色列游说团与美国外交政策

The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy
课程网址: http://videolectures.net/mitworld_walt_mearsheimer_riedel_israel/  
主讲教师: Stephen Walt, John Mearsheimer, Bruce Riedel
开课单位: 肯尼迪政府学院
开课时间: 2013-01-28
课程语种: 英语
中文简介:
“以色列大厅”和“美国外交政策”的作者在环城公路和美国各地的校园引起了轰动。在这里,他们通过以色列不应该得到美国无条件支持的论点,向麻省理工学院的观众致敬。史蒂芬沃尔特建立了一个特殊的案例美国和以色列之间存在关系,涉及数十亿美元的经济和军事援助。即使以色列正在做美国反对的事情,每个以色列公民每年可获得500美元的支持。沃尔特声称,这种关系主要源于一个强大的,以色列的亲自游说团体的影响,他是个人和团体的松散联盟,他谨慎地说,而不是一个阴谋集团。这个大厅公开影响美国的政策,有利于以色列,并且有足够的影响力,他说“帮助推动被认为无效的政治人员在以色列问题上”,以及“塑造公众话语,以便以色列被大多数美国人看好。 “对以色列行动的批评者通常会发现自己被打上了反犹太主义品牌,并在公共领域被边缘化。”沃尔特指出了各种黑球的例子,包括他自己的书籍巡演中的突然取消,作为大厅影响的证据。这个美国以色列的关系,说John Mearsheimer威胁着两国的国家利益。自1967年战争以来,阿拉伯国家对美国的敌意只是加深了,因为美国在联合国保护以色列,并且无视以色列在巴勒斯坦土地上的扩张。米尔斯海默称,这种怨恨助长了恐怖主义,包括9/11。本拉登“非常关心巴勒斯坦人的困境,因为他是一个年轻人。 ......巴勒斯坦人遭受的不公正回报的概念在他的演讲中有力地反复出现。“现在,伊拉克战争”是美国历史上最严重的战略失误之一,“米尔斯海默说,这有助于巩固对阿拉伯国家对美国和以色列的愤怒。 。米尔斯海默认为,与华盛顿的新保守主义者一道,“以色列和大厅是决定入侵伊拉克的主要推动力量之一。”现在是时候让美国像其他民主国家一样对待以色列,并在“以某种方式行事”时奖励以色列符合美国国家利益,“并且”利用杠杆来改变以色列的行为......“受访者布鲁斯·里德尔认为这些论点”过于简单化了复杂情况。“作为以色列游说的一名供认不讳的成员,以及几轮的亲密党派。在中东和平谈判中,里德尔声称“以色列及其在美国的支持者都不是一个总是得到他们想要的东西,也不是无条件的帮助。”特别是,他争辩说以色列推动与伊拉克的战争:“以色列站在场边并说你得到了错误的“爱尔兰共和军”国家,你应该追逐另一个国家。“他还说,虽然以色列对巴勒斯坦人的政策已经过了在大多数穆斯林世界,这些国家的政策问题不是加沙或以色列约旦河西岸应该回馈多少,而是美国对以色列存在的支持。
课程简介: The authors of The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy caused a sensation on the Beltway and on campuses across the U.S. Here they walk a respectful MIT audience through their argument that Israel does not deserve unconditional support from the U.S. Stephen Walt builds a case that a special relationship exists between the U.S. and Israel, involving billions of dollars’ worth of economic and military aid. This support, amounting to $500 per year for each Israeli citizen, comes even when Israel is doing things the U.S. opposes. Walt claims this relationship derives primarily from the influence of a powerful, pro-Israel lobby -- a loose coalition of individuals and groups, he is careful to say, not a cabal. This lobby functions openly to influence U.S. policy to favor Israel and has enough clout, he says “to help drive politicians from office who are considered ineffective” on Israel issues, as well as “shape public discourse so Israel is viewed favorably by most Americans.” Critics of Israel’s actions typically find themselves branded anti-Semitic “and marginalized in the public arena.” Walt points out various examples of blackballing, including abrupt cancellations in his own book tour, as evidence of the lobby’s impact. This U.S.-Israel relationship, says John Mearsheimer, threatens the national interest of both nations. Hostility toward the U.S. among Arab states has only deepened since the 1967 war, as the U.S. protects Israel in the U.N., and ignores Israeli expansion on Palestinian lands. This resentment is fueling terrorism, including 9/11, Mearsheimer claims. Bin Laden was “deeply concerned with the plight of Palestinians since he was a young man. …The notion of payback for injustices suffered by the Palestinians is powerfully recurrent in his speeches.” Now, the Iraq war -- “one of the worst strategic blunders in American history,” says Mearsheimer -- has helped solidify anger against the U.S. and Israel among Arab nations. Mearsheimer believes that along with Washington’s neoconservatives, “Israel and the lobby were two of the main driving forces behind the decision to invade Iraq.” It’s time for the U.S. to treat Israel like other democracies, and to reward Israel when it behaves “in ways consistent with the U.S. national interest,” and to “use leverage to change Israel’s behavior…” Respondent Bruce Riedel believes these arguments “oversimplify complex situations.” As a confessed member of the Israel lobby, as well as an intimate party to several rounds of Middle East peace talks, Riedel asserts that “neither Israel nor its supporters in the U.S. were a juggernaut always getting what they wanted nor unconditional help.” In particular, he disputes that Israel pushed for a war with Iraq: “Israel stood on the sidelines and said you got the wrong ‘IRA’ country, you should go after the other one.” He also says that while Israel’s policies toward the Palestinians have alienated most of the Muslim world, the policy issue for these countries is not how much of Gaza or the West Bank Israel should give back, but American support for the very existence of Israel.
关 键 词: 以色列大厅; 军事援助; 反犹太主义; 恐怖主义; 伊拉克战争; 穆斯林
课程来源: 视频讲座网
最后编审: 2020-06-08:cxin
阅读次数: 95