0


情景2:大都市政策制定 - 权力与权利

Scenario 2: Metropolitan Policy Making - Power and Rights
课程网址: http://videolectures.net/mit11969s05_fischer_lec03/  
主讲教师: Archon Fung, Frank Fischer, Marianella Sclavi
开课单位: 新泽西州立大学
开课时间: 2012-04-24
课程语种: 英语
中文简介:
大都会机构希望让广泛的利益相关者参与有关区域“公平分享”住房政策的政策对话。州和地铁机构已同意聘请专业的“调解员”来帮助管理大都市范围内的政策对话。问题是,调解员的任务应包括什么,特别是关于低收入居民和有色人种的支持者的参与,他们可能有也可能没有与房地产和市政利益平等参与所需的知识和技能。该地区周边的15个郊区城镇试图抵制诉讼(可能还有州立法),指控他们的专属土地使用政策将穷人排除在中心城外的工作和住房之外。 当利益相关者的不平等权力和能力可能影响结果时,重点是“调解人”在政策对话中的作用。此外,当“权利”(尤其是穷人)受到威胁时,寻求避免或解决诉讼的替代性争议解决(ADR)策略是一个好主意吗?假设大城市机构(自愿的市政间协作)几乎没有权力。当潜在的东道主机构不参选时,产生非正式协议是否有意义?
课程简介: A metropolitan agency wants to engage a wide range of stakeholders in a policy dialogue regarding regional “fair share” housing policy. State and metro agencies have agreed to hire a professional “mediator” to help manage a policy dialogue on a metropolitan scale. The question is, what should the mediator's mandate include, especially with regard to the involvement of advocates of low income residents and residents of color who may or may not have the knowledge and skills needed to participate on an equal footing with real estate and municipal interests. The 15 suburban towns on the periphery of the region are trying to fend off litigation (and possibly state legislation) charging that their exclusive land use policies are excluding poor people from the jobs and housing available outside the central city. The focus is on the role of a “mediator” in a policy dialogue when unequal power and capability among the stakeholders may well influence the outcome. Also, are alternative dispute resolution (ADR) strategies that seek to avoid or settle litigation a good idea when “rights” (particularly of the poor) are at stake? Assume that the metropolitan agency (a voluntary inter-municipal collaborative) has little or no authority. Does it make sense to generate informal agreements when the potential host agency does not stand for election?
关 键 词: 大都会机构; 住房政策; 调解人
课程来源: 视频讲座网
最后编审: 2019-05-19:cjy
阅读次数: 41