首页政治学
   首页考古学
   首页社会学
0


科学政策,政治与人权

Science Policy, Politics and Human Rights
课程网址: http://videolectures.net/mitworld_gottfried_jasanoff_spph/  
主讲教师: Kurt Gottfried, Sheila Jasanoff
开课单位: 康奈尔大学
开课时间: 2011-05-16
课程语种: 英语
中文简介:
在这次演讲中,库尔特·戈特弗里德引用了苏联物理学家和人权冠军安德烈·萨哈罗夫的精神和哲学。戈特弗里德提醒我们,萨哈罗夫是最近一次在科学和政治之间建立了强有力的联系:正如科学依赖于只能通过检验假设得出的客观真理一样,民主共识取决于公共研究和公开讨论事实和信仰。但是,戈特弗里德警告说,我们的国家正在迅速“摆脱基于现实的政策和文化观念”,如果我们的“政策无情地忽视现实,他们就会与之发生冲突。”他说,在这种向不真实的滑坡的背后,是政府的“在向公众和国会宣传其政策方面扭曲了科学知识。”在一长串例子中:系统地歪曲了有关气候变化的科学共识;科学咨询委员会的政治试金石;废除核放松管制咨询委员会;并在政府网站上发布关于乳腺癌和堕胎之间的避孕套和虚假联系的错误信息。戈特弗里德说,“其中一些案例让人想起苏联时代的做法。”他警告说,你可以与现实保持联系的时间有限。“在她的回答中,希拉·亚萨诺夫敦促科学家与其他专家联手。学科作为科学和技术问题的监督者。她说,“人权为这种努力提供了一个很好的保护伞”。亚斯诺夫明确区分了“监管科学”的实践,这种实践从一开始就更加政治化,而研究科学也是如此。她主张公开辩论政策制定背后的价值观,以及“让政治对公众的希望,恐惧,信仰,知识,欲望和需求负责”。
课程简介: In this talk, Kurt Gottfried invokes the spirit and philosophy of Andrei Sakharov, Soviet physicist and human rights champion. It was Sakharov, Gottfried reminds us, who in recent times forged a powerful connection between science and politics: just as science relies on objective truths which can only be arrived at through testing of hypotheses, a democratic consensus depends on public study and open discussion of facts and beliefs. But, Gottfried warns, our nation is rapidly “moving away from a reality-based conception of policy and culture” and if our “policies relentless ignore reality, they will collide with it.” Behind this slide toward unreality, he says, is the government’s “distortion of scientific knowledge in advocating its policies to the public and Congress.” Among a long list of examples: the systematic misrepresentation of the scientific consensus about climate change; political litmus tests for scientific advisory committees; abolishing advisory committees on nuclear deregulation; and posting misinformation on government websites about a condoms and spurious links between breast cancer and abortion. Says Gottfried, “Some of these cases are reminiscent of Soviet-era practices.” He warns that there’s a limit to how long you can stay out of contact with reality.” In her response, Sheila Jasanoff urges scientists to join hands with experts from other disciplines to serve as watchdogs on issues of science and technology. She says that “human rights provides a wonderful umbrella” for such an effort. Jasanoff makes a clear distinction between the practice of ‘regulatory science,’ which is more politicized from the get-go, and research science. She argues for public debate on the values that lie behind policy-making, and to “hold politics answerable to public hopes, fears, beliefs, knowledge, desire and needs.”
关 键 词: 人权; 政治; 民主共识
课程来源: 视频讲座网
最后编审: 2019-05-29:lxf
阅读次数: 58