0


使用语义距离与不一致本体进行推理

Using Semantic Distances for Reasoning with Inconsistent Ontologies
课程网址: http://videolectures.net/iswc08_huang_usdr/  
主讲教师: Zhisheng Huang
开课单位: 阿姆斯特丹大学
开课时间: 2008-11-24
课程语种: 英语
中文简介:
在Web上重新使用和组合多个本体必然会导致组合词汇表之间的不一致。即使许多现在使用的本体在一些隐含的知识被明确化后也会变得不一致。然而,当前的语义Web推理系统缺乏处理不一致的强大而有效的方法,这些系统通常基于经典逻辑。在早期的论文中,我们已经提出使用句法相关性函数作为不一致本体的推理方法。在本文中,我们将该工作扩展到语义距离的使用。我们将展示如何使用Google距离来开发语义相关性函数,以推断出不一致的本体。本质上,我们使用隐藏在Web中的隐式知识来进行显式推理。我们已将此方法作为PION推理系统的一部分实施。我们报告了几个现实本体的实验。测试结果表明,混合句法/语义方法可以显着提高推理性能,而不是纯粹的句法方法。此外,我们的方法允许权衡计算成本以推断完整性。我们的实验表明,我们只需要放弃一点质量来获得高性能增益。
课程简介: Re-using and combining multiple ontologies on the Web is bound to lead to inconsistencies between the combined vocabularies. Even many of the ontologies that are in use today turn out to be inconsistent once some of their implicit knowledge is made explicit. However, robust and efficient methods to deal with inconsistencies are lacking from current Semantic Web reasoning systems, which are typically based on classical logic. In earlier papers, we have proposed the use of syntactic relevance functions as a method for reasoning with inconsistent ontologies. In this paper, we extend that work to the use of semantic distances. We show how Google distances can be used to develop semantic relevance functions to reason with inconsistent ontologies. In essence we are using the implicit knowledge hidden in the Web for explicit reasoning purposes. We have implemented this approach as part of the PION reasoning system. We report on experiments with several realistic ontologies. The test results show that a mixed syntactic/semantic approach can significantly improve reasoning performance over the purely syntactic approach. Furthermore, our methods allow to trade-off computational cost for inferential completeness. Our experiment shows that we only have to give up a little quality to obtain a high performance gain.
关 键 词: 组合词汇表; 推理系统; 语义相关性
课程来源: 视频讲座网
最后编审: 2019-04-28:cwx
阅读次数: 49