0


如此错误如此之久: 媒体、专家和总统在伊拉克问题上是如何失败的

So Wrong for So Long: How the Press, the Pundits and the President Failed on Iraq
课程网址: http://videolectures.net/mitworld_mitchell_swsl/  
主讲教师: Greg Mitchell
开课单位: 麻省理工学院
开课时间: 2013-01-28
课程语种: 英语
中文简介:
格雷格米切尔在美国媒体和布什政府围绕伊拉克战争和占领的无耻和近乎普遍的共谋中找到了喜剧和悲剧。米切尔通过最近的激增充分记录了入侵的记录,构成了他的新书“如此错误如此之久:新闻界,权威人士和总统对伊拉克的失败”以及这次谈话的基础。这个国家的主流媒体根据米切尔的说法,对新闻业的基本考验不及格:表现出健康的怀疑态度。 “即使你在Topeka报道一份小报,并采访当地的垃圾部门官员,也不要把他所说的作为福音。与其他人一起检查。“从布什政府提出的入侵的多种理由,到他们关于占领的进度报告,新闻媒体吞噬了官方路线,钩子和坠子,正如米切尔详细叙述的那样。一些例子从早期开始:关于科林鲍威尔在联合国的“扣篮”案件的报道,这些案件确立了萨达姆侯赛因的核野心,事实证明这是一个彻头彻尾的骗局。米切尔说,“如果新闻报道距离现在还有200年左右,这将出现在教科书中。”纽约时报的朱迪米勒正在寻找军方寻找大规模杀伤性武器,“ “根据民意调查,美国人购买并继续相信布什政府将伊拉克与9/11和基地组织联系起来。 “无论这是媒体的错,还是美国人民缺乏兴趣......媒体并没有足够强烈地推动真相,”米切尔说。在“完成任务”之后的五年里,米切尔发现了媒体自我审查的反复出现的主题使用战争的图形图像并记录可怕的细节,无论美国人是否在棺材中飞回家,在伊拉克遭受身心伤害的退伍军人或平民死亡。他指出,尽管有越来越多的证据表明战争正在进行,但没有一家主要报纸在伊拉克改变当然。尽管大多数美国人反对这场战争,但这并没有结束。当布什制定他的激增计划时,“媒体陷入梦游”。更糟糕的是,新的覆盖范围不存在,注意力集中在经济和选举以及伊朗的威胁上。由于媒体忽视了对真理的追求,米切尔担心主流新闻的相关性正在逐渐消失,取而代之的是基于观点的博客和党派网站。
课程简介: Greg Mitchell has found both comedy and tragedy in the shameless and near-universal complicity between the American press and the Bush Administration around the Iraq war and occupation. Mitchell’s amply documented account of the run-up to the invasion through the recent surge forms the basis of his new book, So Wrong for So Long: How the Press, the Pundits and the President Failed on Iraq, and this talk. The nation’s mainstream media flunked a basic test of journalism, according to Mitchell: displaying a healthy skepticism. “Even if you’re reporting for a tiny newspaper in Topeka, and interviewing the local garbage department official, don’t take what he says as gospel. Check it out with other people.” From the multiple rationales offered by the Bush Administration for the invasion, to their progress reports on the occupation, the news media gobbled up the official line, hook and sinker, as Mitchell recounts in detail. Some examples from the early days: newspaper pieces about Colin Powell’s “slam dunk” case at the U.N. establishing Saddam Hussein’s nuclear ambitions, which proved to be a complete sham. Mitchell says, “If the press is still around 200 years from now, this will be in the text books.” And there’s The New York Times’ Judy Miller searching with the military to find weapons of mass destruction, which also “turned out to be bogus.” Americans bought, and according to polls, continue to believe, the Bush Administration’s linkage of Iraq to 9/11, and to Al Qaeda. “Whether this is the media’s fault, or the American people’s lack of interest…the media didn’t push the truth strongly enough,” says Mitchell. In the five years following “mission accomplished” Mitchell finds a recurring theme of media self-censorship around using graphic images of war and documenting the grisly details, whether of Americans flown home in coffins, veterans suffering from physical and mental injuries, or civilian deaths in Iraq. He notes that in spite of mounting evidence that war efforts were foundering, no major newspaper came out for a change of course in Iraq. This hasn’t ended, even with a majority of Americans against the war. The “media went sleepwalking into an abyss” when Bush enacted his plan for the surge. What’s worse, there’s a new absence of coverage, with attention focused on the economy and elections, and the threat of Iran. With the media neglecting the pursuit of truth, Mitchell worries that the relevance of mainstream journalism is fading, replaced by opinion-based blogs and partisan websites.
关 键 词: 伊拉克战争; 媒体; 错误
课程来源: 视频讲座网
最后编审: 2019-06-10:yuh
阅读次数: 30