0


来自新奥尔良的声音：设计和离散规划

Voices from New Orleans: Design and Planning Diaspora
课程网址: http://videolectures.net/mitworld_zante_klingman_barry_tuttle_vno...  
主讲教师: Vale Lawrence J; Klingman John P; William Barry; Richard Tuttle; Lawrence Jenkens; Ellen Weiss; Gary Van Zante
开课单位: 麻省理工学院
开课时间: 2012-02-25
课程语种: 英语
中文简介:
人们普遍认为，把新奥尔良称为家意味着“危险地生活在危险之中”，正如威廉·巴里所说。Lawrence Jenkens说：“当你躲开大家伙时，你会松一口气，但大家伙总是会来的。”既然它来了，接下来呢？大家一致认为，即使在城市最洪水泛滥的地区，也有很多东西是可以挽救的。Ellen Weiss担心“推土和用幻想解决方案从头开始的冲动”，因为许多新奥尔良“猎枪社区”在历史和建筑上都没有得到重视。约翰·克林曼（John Klingman）对“城市已经消失或很好”这一概念持有异议，认为这两者之间的一切都是“城市已经消失或很好”的。许多古老的建筑都是由排水沼泽地中的老柏树建成的，这是一种极有弹性的木材，可以“在很多方面持续或重复使用”。但他说，人们处于困境之中，基础设施也处于困境之中。关键点和规则都被打破了。他指出，问题在于如何“平衡人口与良好规划的关系”。理查德•塔特尔（Richard Tuttle）想知道，城市外围湿地的大部分地区是否应禁止开发，并将其作为自然资源带回。这将给石油行业带来麻烦。尽管旅游业是当务之急，但威廉·巴里担心重建会使“地方的真实性面临风险”。约翰·克林曼建议，通过建造100所新学校，并用对所有经济群体都有吸引力的教育体系来取代虚弱的教育体系，从而避开保护问题。Richard Tuttle希望看到“失业工人学习贸易，并处于重建的中心”，但担心华盛顿将迎合强大的金融和政治利益。“这可能是一个伟大的时刻，但作为一个住在那里的人，我变得愤世嫉俗，”他说。
课程简介: There is general agreement that to call New Orleans home means “living with danger, dangerously,” as William Barry put it. You’re “relieved when you dodge the big one, but the big one was always going to come,” says Lawrence Jenkens. So now that it has come, what next? There’s a consensus here that much is salvageable—even in the most flooded areas of the city. Ellen Weiss worries about “the impulse to bulldoze and start from scratch with a fantasy solution,” because so many of New Orleans “shotgun neighborhoods” are underappreciated historically and architecturally. John Klingman disputes the notion that the city is “gone or fine—it’s everything in between.” Many of the older buildings are made of old growth cypress from drained swampland—an extremely resilient wood that could “endure or be reused in many ways.” But, he says, the people are in limbo, and the infrastructure and rules are broken. The question is how to “balance repopulating with good planning.” Richard Tuttle wonders if large sections of the city’s outlying wetlands should be off limits to development and “brought back as natural resources.” This would raise hackles in the petroleum industry, he notes. And while tourism is a top priority, William Barry worries that rebuilding can put “authenticity of place at risk.” John Klingman suggests sidestepping preservation issues by constructing 100 new schools, and replacing a debilitated education system with one attractive to all economic groups. Richard Tuttle would like to see “unemployed workers learn trades and be at the center of rebuilding,” but frets that Washington will cater to large and powerful financial and political interests. “This is potentially a great moment, but as someone who lives there, I’ve become cynical,” he says.
关 键 词: 新奥尔良; 基础设施; 自然资源; 教育系统; 政治利益
课程来源: 视频讲座网
最后编审: 2020-06-07：yumf
阅读次数: 42

纠错/补充/评论/留言
评论/留言 纠错/补充
验证算术题： 0 + 1 =