基础设施和建筑环境的机会Opportunities in Infrastructure and Built Environment |
|
课程网址: | http://videolectures.net/mitworld_debate_infrastructure/ |
主讲教师: | Bill Sisson; Judith Layzer; Sarah Slaughter; Milton Bevington |
开课单位: | 麻省理工学院 |
开课时间: | 2012-03-10 |
课程语种: | 英语 |
中文简介: | 世界上一半的人口目前生活在城市中,随着城市聚居区吞噬世界上大部分的自然资源并排放出最多的污染物,这一数字呈螺旋上升趋势。难怪这些小组成员认为可持续发展的挑战(和机遇)比让人们从白炽灯泡转向荧光灯更大。“最新的城市治理热”说,朱迪思·莱泽正在使你的城市尽可能的可持续发展。例如,纽约曾发誓要种植100万棵树,并将整个出租车车队改造成混合动力车。芝加哥的屋顶覆盖着绿色;多伦多堆肥。莱泽认为,有充分的理由让人担心,我们会看到一些象征性的承诺,但做得不多。城市努力进行体制改革,部分原因是它们无法控制能源(如石油)的供求机制,这有助于推动通勤和公共交通行为。在历史上,城市也支持不受限制的增长,以保持其高税基,当面临一个明智的、节约污染的计划时,例如将交通灯换成LED灯泡,在高昂的前期成本下畏缩。莱泽认为,成功的城市可持续发展计划将取决于各国政府对自然资源的适当定价(例如,取消对化石燃料的补贴);有效的地方领导层,使停车费和拥堵收费等经常不受欢迎的计划成为可能;以及主要的联盟建设。米尔顿•贝文顿说,如果今天的建筑没有改变以减少二氧化碳排放量,那么大量的绿色建筑将不会有助于将温室气体减少到理想的水平。他与克林顿气候倡议(CCI)在全球40个城市的简介是,提供基于市场的解决方案,而不是施舍或退税,以获得有效的热量和电力进入数以百万计的住宅和商业建筑。Bevington的大部分工作是向房东和其他人介绍改造旧建筑的新融资方法。例如:芝加哥一家银行设计了一项贷款,使该市55万套多户住宅的业主能够使用“能源绩效担保”作为抵押品。借来的资金用于减少水和能源的使用,而“偿还银行所需的每一美元”都来自于能源使用的减少。联合技术公司(United Technologies)的比尔•西森(Bill Sisson)表示,贝文顿希望看到更多由投资者推动的节能项目融资,他认为这一融资可能迅速蔓延到富国和穷国,以改变建筑环境的一个大部门。世界上大多数大企业都面临两难境地。“在节能建筑的商业联盟中,为人指点迷津。虽然企业认识到能源效率的重要性,但只有13%的企业面临着挑战。Sisson的团队致力于为建筑零净能源使用制定路线图,包括技术、改进的财务机制和行为改变。Sisson说:“这实际上是为了管理风险和以正确的方式指导业务的未来;我们认为这方面的建筑对于我们的发展和市场占有率至关重要。 |
课程简介: | Half the world’s population currently lives in cities, and that number is spiraling upward, as urban settlements gobble up most of the world’s natural resources and emit the most pollutants. No wonder that these panelists perceive the challenge (and opportunity) of sustainability as much bigger than getting people to switch from incandescent light bulbs to fluorescents. The “latest craze in city governance,” says Judith Layzer is making your city as sustainable as possible. New York for instance, has vowed to plant one million trees, and convert its entire taxi fleet to hybrids. Chicago is covering its rooftops in green; Toronto composts. Layzer believes there are “good reasons to worry we’ll see symbolic commitments with not much done.” Cities struggle to undertake systemic change, partly because they don’t control the supply and demand mechanism for energy resources such as oil, which helps drive commuting and mass transit behaviors. Cities have also historically supported unfettered growth to keep their tax base high, and when confronted with a sensible, pollution saving plan such as switching traffic lights to LED lightbulbs, cringe at the high upfront costs. Layzer thinks successful urban sustainability initiatives will depend on national governments pricing natural resources appropriately (e.g., eliminating subsidies on fossil fuels); effective local leadership that makes the case for often unpopular schemes like parking fees and congestion pricing; and major coalition building. No amount of green construction will help with reducing greenhouse gases to desirable levels if today’s buildings aren’t altered to reduce their CO2 emissions, says Milton Bevington. His brief with the Clinton Climate Initiative (CCI) in 40 cities worldwide is to provide market-based solutions, not handouts or tax rebates, to get efficient heat and power into millions of residential and commercial buildings. A large part of Bevington’s job is educating landlords and others about new financing approaches for retrofitting old buildings. One example: a Chicago bank designed a loan enabling the owners of the city’s 550 thousand multifamily housing units to use an “energy performance guarantee” as collateral. Borrowed funds go into reducing water and energy use, and “every single dollar required to pay back the bank” comes from a reduction in energy use. Bevington would like to see more investor-driven financing for energy efficient projects, which he believes could spread swiftly in both rich and poor countries “to change a large sector of the built environment.” There’s a dilemma brewing for most of the world’s big businesses, says Bill Sisson, who is United Technologies’ point man in a business consortium effort on energy efficient buildings. While firms recognize the importance of energy efficiency, only 13% are rising to the challenge. Sisson’s group seeks to create a roadmap for zero net energy use in buildings, involving technology, improved financial mechanisms, and behavior change. Says Sisson, this is “really about managing risk and directing the future of business in the right way; we see this aspect of buildings as critical for our growth and presence in the market. |
关 键 词: | 自然资源; 污染排放物; 建筑融资; 节能建筑; 企业联盟 |
课程来源: | 视频讲座网 |
最后编审: | 2020-05-21:吴雨秋(课程编辑志愿者) |
阅读次数: | 63 |