0


维持城市:环境,经济发展与赋权

Sustaining Cities: Environment, Economic Development, and Empowerment
课程网址: http://videolectures.net/mitworld_vale_layzer_corburn_thompson_ze...  
主讲教师: Vale Lawrence J; Judith Layzer; Adil Najam; J. Phillip Thompson; Jason Corburn; Christopher Zegras
开课单位: 麻省理工学院
开课时间: 2013-07-29
课程语种: 英语
中文简介:
这五位发言者努力解决可持续性概念的转变。Judith Layzer提倡“强大的可持续性”而不是传统的方法,这种方法设想人力资本和技术总是可以替代从自然世界中获取的资源财富。发展和富裕反而使生态系统退化。“强大的可持续性”要求生活在自然的生产能力范围内,满足当前一代人的需求,而不是他们的需求。“富裕社会必须通过法律来控制人口增长和抑制消费,并制定区域合作和公平贸易政策。JasonCorburn描述了一个连接生态、经济和社会正义问题的环境正义框架,特别是在城市环境中。科尔伯恩询问了环境商品和邪恶(如公园和污染)的分布;谁参与了规则制定和执行;以及环境正义如何在制度上演变和强制执行。过去的主要教训是,自愿执行环境正义指导方针不起作用,我们必须“找到一个法律或监管棒来实现其目标”。“在我的家乡,我把这种绿色的东西看作是富人的运动,”纽约房屋经理菲利普·汤普森(Phillip Thompson)说。环境保护主义者推动了结束垃圾焚烧的清洁空气法,但给住房项目留下了一项没有资金的任务,即自行打包垃圾。汤普森承认,能源危机对许多低收入城市居民来说是一个紧急情况,他们面临着高昂的供暖成本:“如果不是绿色的话,我们就不能提供经济适用房”,但将城市改造成经济适用房和绿色住宅意味着体制改革。例如,谁将为贫困地区的建筑提供节能技术,谁将培训和教育这一转型所需的劳动力?“我们想要维持什么?Chris Zegras问道。他认为答案是获得促进发展的机会。社会如何在不剥夺后代这样做的能力的情况下扩大可及性?Zegras说,很难说气候变化对一个每天乘坐3小时公交车去上班的人的重要性,而且一半的工资被乘坐公交车的人消耗掉了。首先,我们必须缓解穷人的基本无障碍问题:他们缺乏负担得起的交通工具和接近学校的地方,以及乔布斯。Zegras建议通过自行车和汽车共享等创新部分解决全球交通危机。阿迪尔纳贾姆说,从地球上看,它就像一个国家,你必须得出这样的结论:它是一个贫穷的、极端分裂的、退化的、管理不善的、不安全的第三世界国家。Najam说,解决环境问题是发展的关键,因为“穷人首先受到打击,而且受到的打击最大”。气候问题已经从分子讨论转向适应,但我们在很大程度上仍然不知道如何减轻和适应。更糟糕的是,各国都走错了方向,仅以“排放量和美元”来衡量问题。当一名孟加拉国渔民在上涨的水域失去工作时,其成本是多少?Najam总结道:“我们需要增加生计货币。”
课程简介: These five speakers grapple with shifting notions of sustainability. Judith Layzer advocates “strong sustainability” in lieu of the conventional approach, which imagines human-made capital and technology can always substitute for the wealth of resources drawn from the natural world. Development and affluence have instead degraded ecosystems. Strong sustainability “entails living within the productive capacity of nature…meeting the needs of the current generation as opposed to their demands.” Wealthy societies must adopt laws to contain population growth and curb consumption, and develop regional cooperation and fair trade policies. Jason Corburn describes an environmental justice framework that connects ecological, economic and social justice issues, especially in urban settings. Corburn asks about the distribution of environmental goods and evils (such as parks and pollution); who participates in rule-making and enforcement; and how environmental justice evolves institutionally, and is enforced. The key lesson of the past is that voluntary enforcement of environmental justice guidelines don’t work, and we must “find a legal or regulatory stick to implement” its goals. “Where I’m from, I see this green thing as a rich people’s movement,” says Phillip Thompson, who was a housing manager in New York. Environmentalists pushed clean air laws that ended the incineration of garbage -- but left housing projects with an unfunded mandate to bag their own waste. Thompson acknowledges the energy crisis is an emergency for many lower-income city dwellers hit with high heating costs: “We can’t do affordable housing if it isn’t green.” But transforming cities into affordable and green places means systemic change. Who, for example, will pay for outfitting buildings in poorer neighborhoods with energy conserving technology, and who will train and educate the workforce required for this transformation? “What are we trying to sustain?” asks Chris Zegras. He believes the answer is access to opportunities that enable development. How do societies expand accessibility without depriving future generations of the ability to do so? Zegras says it’s hard to argue the importance of climate change to someone “who travels 3 ½ hours a day on a bus to get to a job, and half the salary is eaten up by the bus ride.” First, we must alleviate fundamental issues of accessibility for the poor: their lack of affordable transportation and proximity to schools and jobs. Zegras recommends addressing the worldwide crisis in transportation, in part through such innovations as bike and car sharing. Looking down on Earth as if it were one country, says Adil Najam, you’d have to conclude it is poor, extremely divided, degraded, poorly governed and unsafe – a Third-world country. Addressing the environment turns on development, since “the poor are hit first and hit most.” The climate question has moved from discussion of molecules to adaptation, but we remain largely ignorant about how to mitigate and adapt, Najam says. Worse, nations are off on the wrong foot, measuring the problem in terms of only “emissions and dollars.” When a Bangladeshi fisherman loses his work to rising waters, what is the cost? “We need to add the currency of livelihood,” concludes Najam.
关 键 词: 可持续发展; 环境正义; 生态; 经济; 社会公正
课程来源: 视频讲座网
最后编审: 2020-06-07:yumf
阅读次数: 44