语言的演变Evolution of language |
|
课程网址: | http://videolectures.net/bzid2010_szathmary_eol/ |
主讲教师: | Eörs Szathmáry |
开课单位: | 洛兰大学 |
开课时间: | 2010-11-22 |
课程语种: | 英语 |
中文简介: | 语言是很难理解的,因为我们不知道大脑是如何处理语言的。人脑的许多区域都参与与语言有关的活动,包括句法操作。语言能力方面具有显著的遗传力。在我们的进化历史上,似乎有积极的选择来提高语言能力,即使大多数隐含的基因不太可能只影响语言能力。复杂的心智理论、教学、因果理解、工具制造、模仿、复杂的合作、精确的运动控制、共同的意向性和语言共同构成了人类中一个协同的适应性套件。一些关键的中间表型,如类比推理,可能在这些能力中发挥了重要作用。多效性可能加速而不是阻碍了进化。特别是,基因在进化过程中发生了变化,从而使人类大脑在语言处理方面更加熟练,这似乎是合理的。 自然语言是一种令人着迷的现象,它无疑在一定程度上是生物性的。猿类、海豚和鹦鹉与人类不同,无论他们如何努力,都无法通过学习来获得语言。在我们的遗传禀赋中,一定有某种东西使人类“准备好”学习语言。有些人认为这种准备就绪只是由于更高的智力。尽管从非常广泛的意义上讲,这可能是正确的,但这种说法并不能解释这种智力与猿类智力的区别。人类似乎已经洞察了物理领域的因果关系,我们能够通过所谓的子装配策略来生产和使用工具。在我们看来,人类似乎拥有一些神经程序能力,而这些能力是由几个重要的官能所共享的,而这些能力仅以非常基本的形式存在于其他动物身上。其中一个过程元素是有效处理层次结构的能力:在语言领域,这是语法的递归元素;在工具制造领域,这是子装配策略;在心智领域理论中,这是二、三、四阶意向性。我们认为,在过去大约500万年中,在人类谱系中有几种不同能力的选择;这些能力在一定程度上是重叠的,选择的强度很可能在这些领域上发生了变化(也许是几次)。可能曾经有一段时期,工具的使用和制造是最受欢迎的,但是后来积极选择的遗传变异很可能在其他一些关键领域是有利的。 |
课程简介: | It is difficult to gain an understanding of language since we do not know how it is processed in the brain. Many areas of the human brain are involved in language- related activities, including syntactic operations. Aspects of the language faculty have significant heritability. There seems to have been positive selection for enhanced linguistic ability in our evolutionary past, even if most implied genes are unlikely to affect only the language faculty. Complex theory of mind, teaching, understanding of cause and effect, tool making, imitation, complex cooperation, accurate motor control, shared intentionality, and language together form a synergistic adaptive suite in the human race. Some crucial intermediate phenotypes, such as analogical inference, could have played an important role in several of these capacities. Pleiotropic effects may have accelerated, rather than retarded, evolution. In particular, it is plausible that genes changed during evolution so as to render the human brain more proficient in linguistic processing. Natural language is a fascinating phenomenon, and it is undoubtedly partly biological. Apes, dolphins, and parrots, unlike humans, are unable to acquire language by learning, no matter how hard they try. There must be something in our genetic endowment that makes humans “ready” for language. Some people think that this readiness is simply due to higher intelligence. Although this may be true in a very broad sense, such claims do not explain how this intelligence differs from that of, say, apes. Humans seem to have gained an insight into the cause and effect in the physical domain, and we are able to produce and use tools by the so-called subassembly strategy. To us it seems that humans possess a few neural procedural capacities that are shared by several important faculties, and that these exist only in very rudimentary forms in other animals. One such procedural element is the ability to handle hierarchical structures efficiently: in the language domain, this is the recursive element of syntax; in the tool-making domain, this is the subassembly strategy; in the theory of mind domain, this is second-, third-, and fourth-order intentionality. We propose that over the past ca. 5 million years, there has been selection on several different capacities in the hominine lineage; these capacities are partly overlapping, and the intensity of selection most likely shifted (perhaps several times) over these domains. There could have been a period during which tool use and tool making were primarily favoured, but then the positively selected genetic variants could well have turned out to be favourable in some of the other critical domains. |
关 键 词: | 语言演变; 心智理论; 人脑对语言的处理; 自然语言; 遗传因素 |
课程来源: | 视频讲座网 |
最后编审: | 2019-10-22:cwx |
阅读次数: | 55 |