首页政治学理论
   首页其它
0


费利克斯法兰克福的复仇?民主政治由法官决定

Felix Frankfurter's Revenge? A Democracy Built by Judges
课程网址: http://ocw.uci.edu/lectures/lecture.aspx?id=164  
主讲教师: Burt Neuborne
开课单位: 加州大学尔湾分校
开课时间: 2010-01-01
课程语种: 英语
中文简介:
从贝克诉卡尔案(1962年)的具有里程碑意义的决定开始,最高法院近50年来一直积极参与塑造美国民主。在他的异议中,菲利克斯法兰克福法官警告说,在我们允许法官作为业余政治科学家对美国民主运作起最后决定的那一天,我们会懊恼。足够的时间来测试法兰克福法官的假设。像布什诉戈尔案(2000年)那样,五名大法官在2000年总统大选中阻止佛罗里达州的选票,以及公民联合诉联邦选举委员会(2010年),其中五名法官将美国民主转为公司说客,意味着法兰克福是对的? Burt Neuborne教授是纽约大学法学院Inez Milholland公民自由教授和纽约大学法学院布伦南司法中心法律主任。他的研究重点是民主进程的运作。
课程简介: Beginning with its landmark decision in Baker v. Carr (1962), the Supreme Court has been actively involved in shaping American democracy for almost 50 years. In his dissent, Justice Felix Frankfurter warned we would rue the day we allowed judges, acting as amateur political scientists, to have the final word on the functioning of American democracy. Enough time has passed to test Justice Frankfurter's hypothesis. Do cases like Bush v. Gore (2000), where five Justices prevented the counting of Florida's votes in the 2000 presidential election, and Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010), where five justices turned American democracy over to corporate lobbyists, mean that Frankfurter was right? Professor Burt Neuborne is the Inez Milholland Professor of Civil Liberties at New York University School of Law and the Legal Director of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law. He focuses his research on the operation of the democratic process.
关 键 词: 民主政治; 法官; 法兰克福; 民主进程运行
课程来源: 加州大学尔湾分校公开课
最后编审: 2020-09-26:yumf
阅读次数: 63