首页生物学
   首页语言学
   首页历史学
0


语言学院的生物学:它的完善、过去和未来

The Biology of the Language Faculty: Its Perfection, Past and Future
课程网址: http://videolectures.net/mitworld_chomsky_blf/  
主讲教师: Noam Chomsky
开课单位: 麻省理工学院
开课时间: 2012-02-10
课程语种: 英语
中文简介:
Noam Chomsky围绕着他的大部分Syntax系列的作品,让听众一瞥他自己思想的演变,重点是语言学领域,其中计算考虑起着重要作用.Chomsky简要概述了基于生物学的关键组成部分。 50年前开始出现的语言学:第一,遗传语言禀赋(Universal Grammar),与外部环境相互作用,第二,个人的发展和学习策略。虽然UG被称为“有争议的”,乔姆斯基说,“另类是魔术”,因为有些东西必须说明“我的孙女选择了她的环境的一部分作为语言相关的事实,并且她的宠物几乎反射性地开发了一种语言小猫,黑猩猩或鸣禽,暴露于完全相同的数据,没有采取第一步,不可能想到第二步。“乔姆斯基将涉及建筑的第三个语言因素和数据采集的基本原则联系到自然法则可能普遍适用于生物学,而不是专门用于语言。研究表明,在50到10万年前,人类在认知能力方面取得了突然的进化飞跃。语言似乎在这个时候出现了。乔姆斯基说,虽然长期演变可能导致极大的复杂性,但像乔姆斯基这样的突然飞跃,往往会产生一些“简单,几乎完美的解决方案来设计出现时出现的环境和条件所带来的问题......”乔姆斯基认为,该提议被称为强极简主义理论(SMT),并提供了一种合理的方法来研究语言的复杂性。 “检查那些被称为松散语言的现象的范围”可能证明是有利可图的,并试图“解开它们,使它们的某些部分或多或少符合SMT。”在这里,乔姆斯基说,计算效率的问题发挥作用也许是一个压倒一切的角色.Chomsky将SMT与转换语法联系起来,这是他语言学理论的一个长期组成部分。他指出“一种简单的转换语法形式只是最优的系统,如果你没有这种形式,你就不得不争论为什么不这样做。”设计良好的系统应该简单明了属性。他建议“削减Universal Grammar规定的属性,并提出处理特定问题的技术,看看你能用多么接近的方式证明语言与完美的设计相近,而这似乎是一种自然的期望,因为这似乎是进化的历史。”
课程简介: Noam Chomsky, around whose work much of the Syntax series revolves, gives listeners a glimpse into the evolution of his own thinking, with an emphasis on areas of linguistics where computational considerations play a major role. Chomsky briefly outlines the key components of a biologically based linguistics that began to emerge 50 years ago: first, a genetic language endowment (Universal Grammar), which interacts with the external environment, and second, the individual’s development and learning strategies. While UG has been called “controversial,” says Chomsky, the “alternative is magic,” since something has to account for the fact that “my granddaughter picked out part of her environment as language related, and almost reflexively developed a language while her pet kitten, a chimp or songbird, exposed to exactly the same data, didn’t take the first step and couldn’t conceivably take the second.” Chomsky links a third factor of language involving architecture and the principles underlying data acquisition to natural laws that may apply generally in biology, and not specifically to language. Research suggests that between 50 and 100 thousand years ago, humans made an abrupt evolutionary leap forward in cognitive capacity. Language seems to have emerged at this time. While long-term evolution can lead to great complexity, a sudden leap like this, says Chomsky, tends to yield something “simple, almost perfect -- a perfect solution to design problems imposed by circumstances and conditions prevailing at the time of emergence...” This proposal has been dubbed the Strong Minimalist Theory (SMT), and offers a plausible approach to studying the complexity of language, believes Chomsky. It might prove profitable to “examine the range of phenomena that fall under what’s loosely called language,” and try to “disentangle them so some parts of them conform more or less to SMT.” And here, says Chomsky, issues of computational efficiency play perhaps an overwhelming role. Chomsky links SMT to transformational grammar, a long-standing component of his linguistic theory. He states that “a simple form of transformational grammar is just the optimal system, and if you don’t have it, you’d have to have an argument as to why you don’t.” Well-designed systems should have simple, sensible properties. He recommends “chipping away at the stipulated properties of Universal Grammar, and technologies proposed to deal with particular problems to see how closely you can show that language does approximate to the perfect design that would be a natural expectation in light of what appears to be evolutionary history.”
关 键 词: 语言学; 语言禀赋; 外部环境
课程来源: 视频讲座网
最后编审: 2019-05-21:cwx
阅读次数: 58