0


新闻的未来

The Future of the News
课程网址: http://videolectures.net/mitworld_hume_news/  
主讲教师: 信息不详。欢迎您在右侧留言补充。
开课单位:
开课时间: 2011-10-10
课程语种: 英语
中文简介:
Ellen Hume预测与麻省理工学院博物馆人群就新闻的未来进行“好消息对话”,但所有参与者最终都在努力为报纸和其他传统新闻形式面临的严峻形势找到一线希望。商业模式,休谟解释说,对于大大小小的报纸以及人们依赖的其他主流媒体来说,这已经深受打击。宣传分类广告的想法已经灭绝,被Craigslist和Cars.com等网站征服。记者所做的重要工作,收集,分析,背景化和传播信息,并提供共同的参考框架,已经开始转移到网络和其他地方。这一点并不全是坏事,休谟认为,因为而不是依靠专家以“自上而下的形式”提供信息,我们获得参与式新闻,用户可以在其中回复和交换信息。这“改变了权力关系。”机构已经从创造信息流的精英转向公民记者。被新闻报道激动的用户有机会通过社交网络,视频,博客做出反应,“创造一种社区感。”休谟说,这使得“一种新的公共空间感”。但是,完全依赖这些公共空间存在危险。新的信息来源。并非所有公民都拥有专业记者的专业知识,他们花了数年时间学习主题和来源。 “我们可能会失去验证......背景......透明......独立感......以及主流媒体的大扩音器。”然而,我们也可能获得一些东西:真实性,来自目击者;关注故事的连续性;和验证,通过众包。休谟认为用新媒体资源取代传统新闻的一些功能是可能的,新媒体可以建立大量的在线档案,从不断扩大的资源中收集,以逮捕方式可视化数据,并吸引用户。网络记者必须承担责任“将小麦从谷壳中分离出来,充分注意知道某些东西是否可信,何时非常难以辨别。”休谟说,要弄清楚如何将媒体素养技能融入所有课程中,这一点至关重要。与此同时,报纸可能会有一些希望:休谟引用网站Spot.Us,允许人们进行小额支付,以涵盖有价值的社区故事; ProPublica,由慈善机构资助的重磅印刷记者联合体;和纽约时报的多媒体事业。最终,我们可能不得不为网上或网上的好报纸支付额外费用,而“新闻的动态和令人兴奋的未来......转移到互联网,手机和移动设备上。”
课程简介: Ellen Hume predicts a “good news conversation” with her MIT Museum crowd about the future of news, but all participants end up working very hard to find a silver lining in the dire situation facing newspapers and other traditional forms of journalism. The business model, Hume explains, is deeply broken for newspapers, big and small, and other mainstream media that people count on. Advertising -- the very idea of the classifieds -- is going extinct, vanquished by sites like Craigslist and Cars.com. The important work that journalists do, collecting, analyzing, contextualizing and disseminating information, and providing common frames of reference, has begun to migrate to the web and elsewhere. This isn’t all bad, believes Hume, because instead of relying on experts who deliver information in a “top-down form,” we get participatory journalism, where users can respond to and exchange information. This “changes power relationships.” Agency has shifted from elites who create the flow of information, to citizen journalists. Users stirred by a news story have opportunities to react via social networks, videos, blogs, “creating a sense of community.” This, says Hume, enables “a new sense of public space.” But there are dangers in relying exclusively on these new sources of information. Not all citizens have the expertise of a professional journalist, who’s spent years learning about subjects and sources. “We may lose verification....context….transparency….a sense of independence…and the big megaphone of mainstream media.” Yet we may also gain some things: authenticity, from eyewitnesses; continuity of attention to a story; and verification, via crowd sourcing. Hume thinks it’s possible to replace some of the functions of traditional journalism with the resources of new media, which can build massive online archives, collect from continuously expanding sources, visualize data in arresting ways, and engage its users. Web journalists must accept the responsibility of “separating wheat from chaff, paying enough attention to know if something’s credible or not, when it’s awfully hard to tell.” It’s going to be essential, Hume says, to “figure out how to build media literacy skills into all curricula.” At the same time, there may be some hope for newspapers: Hume cites website Spot.Us that permits people to make micropayments to cover worthy community stories; ProPublica, a consortium of heavy-hitting print journalists funded by philanthropy; and The New York Times multimedia venture. Ultimately, we may have to pay a premium for a good newspaper, on or off the web, while “the dynamic and exciting future of news…moves to the internet, cellphones and mobile devices.”
关 键 词: 传统新闻; 主流媒体; 互联网
课程来源: 视频讲座网
最后编审: 2019-06-04:cwx
阅读次数: 83