0


公民媒体在2008年美国总统选举中的作用

The Role of Civic Media in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election
课程网址: http://videolectures.net/mitworld_jenkins_rcm/  
主讲教师: Henry Jenkins
开课单位: 麻省理工学院
开课时间: 2011-10-10
课程语种: 英语
中文简介:
在“魔兽世界”中,在线“部落”形式的成员虽然在地理上分散,但却对彼此表现出强烈的忠诚 - 让人联想起邻居保龄球联盟的Henry Jenkins。他想知道鼓励远距离联系的新媒体平台是否有助于让美国人回归更加个人化和直接的公民参与。 在Alvin Toffler指出美国社会由于社会流动性增加而崩溃四十年后,数字技术使我们“建立了牢固的友谊,并随身携带它们,无论我们搬家,”詹金斯说。社会关系可以不考虑地理而存在,但新型社会组织如何影响我们的政治,特别是在地方层面呢?当地报纸折叠,媒体转变为印刷/在线/广播杂交,人们会在哪里寻求有关其社区的信息?詹金斯和麻省理工学院的未来思域媒体骑士中心希望探索和测试可能有助于激发社区内公共话语和民主的新技术。 詹金斯与麻省理工学院博物馆观众讨论了最近总统竞选中部署的媒体平台的激增。他喜欢“将民主从特殊事件转变为生活方式”这一概念,并想知道围绕奥巴马竞选活动建立的在线和离线网络是否会在选举中存活下来并以其他形式继续存在。 “是否有公民投票,集体情报,他(奥巴马)收集公众的见解前进?”詹金斯希望新技术提供“共同空间”来讨论公民善意和社区领导力。但他担心排除一些团体。大多数年轻人都有在线访问权限,“但仍然面临与技能,知识,经验,权利感或赋权感有关的参与差距。” 真正的诀窍是将“真实世界和虚拟世界连接起来,以便一个人的后果渗透到另一个世界。”詹金斯提供了一些有趣的例子:全球儿童组织,一个连接全球青少年领导者的纽约组织,因此他们面对面地处理问题在他们自己的社区,从垃圾收集到志愿者项目。他们还提高了对达尔富尔和儿童卖淫等大问题的认识。有一种新的“地方博客”趋势,即个人在超级本地层面上报道事件。一些Facebook用户发现了一种羞辱未登记的选民熟人的方式 - 詹金斯并不完全习惯这种策略。
课程简介: In World of Warcraft, online ‘clans’ form whose members, while dispersed geographically, exhibit fierce loyalty toward each other -- reminiscent, says Henry Jenkins of neighborhood bowling leagues. He wonders whether new media platforms that encourage bonding over long distances might help move Americans back toward more personal and immediate civic engagement. Forty years after Alvin Toffler noted that American society was fragmenting due to increased social mobility, digital technology permits us “to build strong friendships and carry them with us wherever we move,” says Jenkins. Social ties can exist without regard to geography, but how do new kinds of social organization play into our politics, especially at the local level? And as local newspapers fold, and media outlets morph into print/online/broadcast hybrids, where will people turn for information about their communities? Jenkins and MIT’s Knight Center for Future Civic Media hope to explore and test new technologies that might help invigorate public discourse and democracy within communities. Jenkins discusses with an MIT Museum audience the proliferation of media platforms deployed in the recent presidential campaign. He likes the notion of “moving democracy from special event to a lifestyle,” and wonders if the on- and off-line networks built up around the Obama campaign, for instance, will survive the election and continue in other forms. “Is there a plebiscite version, a collective intelligence, where he (Obama) collects the insights of the public to go forward?” Jenkins would like new technologies to provide “a common space” to discuss civic good and community leadership. But he worries about excluding some groups. Most young people have online access, “but still face a participation gap to do with skills, knowledge, experience, a sense of entitlement or empowerment.” The real trick will be connecting “the real and virtual world together so the consequences of one permeate the other.” Jenkins offers some interesting examples: Global Kids, a New York group linking teen leaders online worldwide, so they work on issues face to face in their own communities, from garbage pickups to volunteer projects. They also develop awareness of larger issues such as Darfur and child prostitution. There’s a new trend of “place blogging,” where individuals report on events on a hyper local level. And some Facebook users found a way of shaming unregistered voter acquaintances – a tactic with which Jenkins isn’t entirely comfortable.
关 键 词: 新媒体平台; 社会流动性; 公共话语
课程来源: 视频讲座网
最后编审: 2019-06-03:cjy
阅读次数: 37