公民媒体的兴起The Emergence of Citizen’s Media |
|
课程网址: | http://videolectures.net/mitworld_thorburn_gillmor_foley_beam_ecm... |
主讲教师: | Ellen Foley, Dan Gillmor, David Thorburn, Alex Beam |
开课单位: | 麻省理工学院 |
开课时间: | 2011-02-21 |
课程语种: | 英语 |
中文简介: | 额外的,额外的,浏览所有关于它!报纸(我们知道)是历史。大卫·索伯恩巧妙地描述了这种情况:“队列越年轻,对印刷材料的兴趣就越小,对新兴技术的投入越少。这意味着,在25到30年内,将不会有人想要阅读报纸。“这些小组成员讨论报纸在数字时代的转型。但丹·吉尔摩认为如果传统报纸无法生存将是一个悲剧,目前基于互联网的媒体民主化,以及易于访问的“生产工具”,并非全是坏事。 “新闻是一个讲座,我们告诉你新闻是什么,你要么买,要么不买。现在,它正在进入类似对话的过程中。“在这个变化的世界中,新闻机构向公众询问他们对事物的了解。还记得伦敦地下爆炸事件的照相手机照片吗?想象一下,如果这项技术在约翰·F·肯尼迪被暗杀时已经可以使用,那就是Gillmor。它不会是一个带摄像头的人,“但是1000,都连接到数字网络。我们知道是否有人在草地上或者只是书店中的一个人。“Ellen Foley承认,她广泛阅读的威斯康星州杂志在小报中很少见。 “除非你在狱中,否则你正在阅读我们的论文,但你不会为此付钱,”她说。她将自己的论文的强大内容归功于中西部的“成为好邻居”的理念。这意味着记者不仅要分享信息,还要听取读者的意见。她将这种方法应用于报纸和纸质网站,用户每天都会对首页的内容进行投票。 Foley担心她的论文的财务可行性,但也希望21世纪互联网技术带来的收入“将支持20世纪讲真话并在社区中发挥作用的价值观。”Alex Beam称自己是“公民的怀疑论者” “媒体,无论那意味着什么。”他感谢像纽约时报这样的报道,“因为说出人们不想要的东西而受到抨击。这是一个过渡时期,我们还没有完全平衡读者和专业人士的股票。“并且不要依赖链接网站来帮助报纸生存,Beam说。正如“波士顿环球报”正在学习的那样,网络通过广告或通过向读者收取获取专门资料(如波士顿红袜队报道或意见专栏)的费用来为网络创造资金是“一种艰难的商业模式”。 Beam说:“我们没有找到编辑判断的价格点,用于调解经验。我们还在挣扎。在所谓的传统报业中,人们对我们可以为此收取的费用感到非常担忧。“ |
课程简介: | Extra, extra, browse all about it! The newspaper (as we know it) is history. As David Thorburn handily describes the situation: “The younger the cohort is, the less interested it is in printed materials and the more committed to emerging technologies. The implication is, within 25 to 30 years, there won’t be people who want to read newspapers.” These panelists discuss newspapers’ transformation in the digital age. While Dan Gillmor thinks it would be a tragedy if traditional newspapers didn’t survive, the current Internet- based democratization of media, with easily accessed “tools of production,” isn’t all bad. “Journalism has been a lecture, where we tell you what the news is, and you either buy it or you don’t. Now it’s moving into something like a conversation.” In this changed world, news organizations ask the public what they know about things. Remember the camera phone photo from the London Underground bombings? Imagine if this technology had been available at the time of John F. Kennedy’s assassination, muses Gillmor. It wouldn’t have been one guy with a camera, “but 1,000, all connected to digital networks. We’d know if anyone was on the grassy knoll or just one guy in the book depository.” Ellen Foley acknowledges that her widely read Wisconsin State Journal is a rarity among smaller newspapers. “Unless you’re in prison, you’re reading our paper, but you’re not paying for it,” she says. She attributes her paper’s robust reach to its Midwest philosophy of “being a good neighbor.” This means journalists must not only share information, but listen to what readers want. She applies this approach both to the newspaper and to the paper’s website, where users vote every day on what makes the front page. Foley worries about the financial viability of her paper, but also hopes that the revenue generated from 21st century Internet technology “will support the 20th century values of telling the truth and making a difference in communities.” Alex Beam pronounces himself a “skeptic of citizens’ media, whatever that means.” He’s grateful to papers like The New York Times, which “get slammed for saying things people don’t want presented. This is a time of transition where we haven’t quite balanced the equities of the readers and the professionals.” And don’t count on linked websites to aid newspaper survival, says Beam. As The Boston Globe is learning, it’s “a hard business model” for the web to generate money either through ads, or by charging readers for access to specialized material, like Boston Red Sox coverage or opinion columns. Beam says, “We haven’t found the price point for editorial judgment, for mediating experience. We’re still floundering. In the so-called traditional newspaper industry, there’s a lot of fear about what we can charge for this.” |
关 键 词: | 传统报业; 数字时代; 媒体民主化 |
课程来源: | 视频讲座网 |
最后编审: | 2020-06-08:cxin |
阅读次数: | 49 |