0


路西法效应:了解好人如何变坏

The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil
课程网址: http://videolectures.net/mitworld_zimbardo_lucifer/  
主讲教师: Philip Zimbardo
开课单位: 斯坦福大学
开课时间: 2011-09-13
课程语种: 英语
中文简介:
也许没有人比菲利普津巴多更好地理解堕落和残忍的根源。他以斯坦福监狱实验这样的研究而闻名,该实验证明了在适当的情况下,普通人能够迅速成为不道德的怪物。 Zimbardo表示,邪恶并不是个人所固有的,而是在一系列非人性和压力环境展开时可靠地出现。因此,毫无疑问,津巴多已经将他的专业知识和道义上的愤怒借给了在阿布格莱布监狱犯下虐待行为的美国预备役人员。 津巴多的最新着作“路西法效应”试图理解“人们如何做善事。”他的讲话概述了他作为阿布格莱布负责的一名军警的辩护团队的专家见证,并提供了丰富的历史对伊拉克明显的行为转变的心理学研究。首先,津巴多展示了阿布格莱布可憎的幻灯片,其中包括一些媒体没有广泛传播的数码照片。然后,他深入挖掘档案,进行了一次可怕的实验性的实验之旅,这些实验提出了一个有说服力的案例,即某些可预测的情况会破坏人们以破坏性的方式挥舞权力。 他描述了斯坦利·米尔格兰姆1963年耶鲁大学的研究,该研究表明人们在面对“实验室外套中的权威”时会表现得很生气。绝大多数受试者在另一个房间里向学习者传达他们被告知的危险电击,显然杀死了另一个人的观点。研究人员怀疑他的结果是否复制了他们。这一次,教授要求学生震惊真正的小狗站在电气烤架上。津巴多自己的监狱实验将一群普通的年轻人变成了权力饥渴的“守卫”,在斯坦福大学心理学楼的地下室羞辱了同样普通的“囚犯”。野蛮的下降是如此之快,以至于Zimbardo几天后不得不取消实验。 行为改变的方法并不复杂。津巴多说:“所有的邪恶始于一个大谎言,无论是宣称是遵循上帝的话,还是需要消除政治反对派。接下来是一个看似微不足道的步骤,连续的小动作,显然是一个明显的权威人物所必需的。这种情况表明其他人遵守相同的规则,也许是抗议,但也遵循相同的规则。如果受害者以某种方式匿名或非人化,那就更好了。退出局势非常困难。 津巴多说,阿布格莱布适应这种情况。那些从未接受过军事审讯人员工作培训的警卫,在混乱,肮脏的条件下工作了12小时轮班,40天不休息,面对1000名外国囚犯,以及附近的敌对火力。根据命令对囚犯施加恐惧,他们在极度紧张的情况下工作。津巴多认为结果是完全可以预测的,虽然从不赦免这些个人责任的士兵,但相信在创造这种情况的人也会受到审判之前不会做出正义:乔治特尼特,唐纳德拉姆斯菲尔德,迪克切尼和乔治布什“。
课程简介: Perhaps no one comprehends the roots of depravity and cruelty better than Philip Zimbardo. He is renowned for such research as the Stanford Prison Experiment, which demonstrated how, in the right circumstances, ordinary people can swiftly become amoral monsters. Evil is not so much inherent in individuals, Zimbardo showed, but emerges dependably when a sequence of dehumanizing and stressful circumstances unfolds. It is no wonder then, that Zimbardo has lent both his expertise and moral outrage to the case of U.S. reservists who perpetrated the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison. Zimbardo’s latest book, The Lucifer Effect, attempts to understand “how good people do evil deeds.” His talk outlines his involvement as expert witness for the defense team of one of the military police officers responsible at Abu Ghraib, and also provides a rich history of psychological research into the kind of behavior transformations evident in Iraq. First, Zimbardo presents a slideshow of Abu Ghraib abominations, including some digital photos that were not widely distributed by the media. Then he digs deep into the archives for a horrifically illustrated tour of experiments that make a persuasive case that certain, predictable situations corrupt people into wielding power in a destructive way. He describes Stanley Milgram’s 1963 Yale-based research demonstrating that people will behave sadistically when confronted by “an authority in a lab coat.” A vast majority of the subjects delivered what they were told were dangerous electric shocks to a learner in another room, to the point of apparently killing the other person. Researchers skeptical of his results replicated them. This time, professors demanded that students shock real puppies standing on electrified grills. Zimbardo’s own prison experiment turned an ordinary group of young men into power-hungry “guards,” humiliating equally ordinary “prisoners” in the basement of Stanford’s psychology building. The descent into barbarity was so rapid that Zimbardo had to cancel the experiment after a few days. The recipe for behavior change isn’t complicated. “All evil begins with a big lie,” says Zimbardo, whether it’s a claim to be following the word of God, or the need to stamp out political opposition. A seemingly insignificant step follows, with successive small actions, presented as essential by an apparently just authority figure. The situation presents others complying with the same rules, perhaps protesting, but following along all the same. If the victims are anonymous or dehumanized somehow, all the better. And exiting the situation is extremely difficult. Abu Ghraib fit this type of situation to a T, says Zimbardo. The guards, never trained for their work helping military interrogators, worked 12-hour shifts, 40 days without a break, in chaotic, filthy conditions, facing 1,000 foreign prisoners, and hostile fire from the neighborhood. They operated in extreme stress, under orders to impose fear on their prisoners. Zimbardo believes the outcome was perfectly predictable, and while never absolving these soldiers of personal responsibility, believes justice won’t be done until “the people who created the situation go on trial as well: George Tenet, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and George Bush.”
关 键 词: 路西法效应; 心理学研究; 行为改变
课程来源: 视频讲座网
最后编审: 2019-06-28:cjy
阅读次数: 155