0


跨语言信息访问,检索,提取,...需求,要求和当前的技术水平

Cross-Lingual Information access, retrieval, extraction, ... needs, requirements and current state of the art
课程网址: http://videolectures.net/mlia09_panel_information/  
主讲教师: Allan Hanbury, Leonoor van der Beek, Khalid Choukri, Jochen L. Leidner
开课单位: 维也纳科技大学
开课时间: 2011-03-26
课程语种: 英语
中文简介:
解决的主要议题如下:\\ *大型用户对多语言信息档案的需求及其要求,期望*当前为企业搜索和网络提供的服务*什么阻止了跨语言搜索应用程序的起飞主题小组讨论是为什么,尽管有10年的MLIA评估(在TREC,CLEF,NTCIR计划内),采用这些技术仍然是一个值得怀疑的问题。本次会议围绕一系列问题进行组织,这些问题事先已分发给小组成员。问题清单如下:\\ *在过去十年左右的时间里,对MLIA进行研究和开发的语言和领域数量大幅增加;是否有来自这些集群的任何杀手级应用程序?*我们是否设法评估了性能,并且这些应用程序与应用程序部署一致;这两个概念是否紧密相关(性能,部署)?*评估是否考虑了正确的需求和要求,并且我们对这些有清晰的了解吗?*如果今天没有成功案例可以提及,那是否意味着关键球员被排除在这些评估之外?为什么?*如果玩家是参与者之一,这是否意味着我们确实拥有无法向真实用户提供的应用/核心技术?* MLIA玩家有哪些优惠可供今天使用,特别是专业人士?*我们能想象以合理的成本(金钱,时间......)满足所有语言和所有领域的需求吗?*小组成员(和参与者)如何解决这些问题并建立高水平合作的指针用户,服务提供商和核心技术提供商之间(包括计算语言学?
课程简介: The main topics that were addressed were the following:\\ * The needs of large users of multilingual information archives and their requirements, expectations * The current offers for enterprise search and web * What is preventing the take off of cross-lingual search applications The theme of the panel discussion was why, despite 10 years of MLIA evaluations (within TREC, CLEF, NTCIR programmes), the adoption of such technologies is still a questionable issue. This session was organized around a series of questions which were circulated to the panelist beforehand. The list of questions was as follows:\\ * During the last ten years or so, the number of languages and domains, for which research and development on MLIA have been conducted, has increased massively; is there any killer application that emerged from such clusters? * Have we managed to assess performance and are these in line with application deployments; are these two concepts strongly related (performance, deployments)? * Did the evaluations consider the right needs and requirements, and by the way do we have a clear picture of these? * If no success story can be mentioned today, does that mean key players were left out of these evaluations? Why? * If players were among the participants, does that mean we do have applications/core-technology with performances that can not be offered to real users? * And what offers do MLIA players have that one can highlight today, in particular for use by professionals? * Can we imagine fulfilling the needs of all languages and all domains at a reasonable cost (money, time, ...)? * How can the panelists (and the participants) address these issues and establish pointers to high levels of cooperation between users, service providers and core-technology providers (including computational linguistics?
关 键 词: 信息档案; 跨语言搜索; 集群
课程来源: 视频讲座网
最后编审: 2019-07-02:cwx
阅读次数: 54