0


不将人工智能人格化的五个原因

Five Reasons Not to Personify AI
课程网址: http://videolectures.net/lawandethics2017_bryson_five_reason/  
主讲教师: Joanna J. Bryson
开课单位: 巴斯大学
开课时间: 2017-07-24
课程语种: 英语
中文简介:
这只是计算被商品化的一个特例,也就是说人工智能改变社会的手段不是微不足道的,而是不如简单的对抗那么透明。智力是对感知到的事件做出适当反应的触发。数千年来,信息技术一直在让人类增强我们这样做的能力。它使我们能够记住和感知比我们作为个体所能记住和感知的更多,这反过来又使我们能够以前所未有的方式进行合作创新,有时会以牺牲彼此、其他群体或生态系统的其他部分为代价。在这次演讲中,我对智能和人工智能建立了一个明确的、基于科学的、功能主义的定义,并由此证明,对人工通用智能和超级智能的担忧是错误的,尽管以不同的方式。然后,我将讨论监管人工智能的努力,重点是六年前英国在机器人原理方面的努力。最后,我将讨论为什么我们不应该将人工智能构建为法律或道德代理人——不是因为这样的构建是不可能的,而是因为它是不明智的,而且很容易避免,至少对于商业产品来说是如此
课程简介: just a special case of computation being commodified, which is to say that the means by which AI is changing society are not trivial, but are less transparent than simple opposition. Intelligence is the triggering of appropriate actions in response to perceived events. Information technology has been allowing humans to enhance our capacity to do this arguably for thousands of years. It allows us to both remember and perceive more than we could as individuals, which in turn allows us to innovate at cooperate in unprecedented ways, sometimes at the expense of each other, other groups or the rest of the ecosystem. In this talk I establish a clear, science-based, functionalist definition of intelligence, and artificial intelligence, demonstrating from this that concerns about artificial general intelligence and superintelligence are misguided, though in different ways. Then I will talk about efforts to regulate AI, with a focus on the British efforts going back six years now with the Principles of Robotics. Finally I will address why we should not construct AI to be legal or moral agents – not because such construction is impossible, but because it is ill advised and easily avoided, at least for commercial products
关 键 词: 人工智能; 信息技术; 机器人
课程来源: 视频讲座网
数据采集: 2022-02-12:zkj
最后编审: 2022-02-12:zkj
阅读次数: 38