0


可持续性只是解决方案的一半,再生是另一半

Sustainability is Only Half the Solution, Regeneration is the Other Half
课程网址: https://videolectures.net/mitworld_sanford_sohs/  
主讲教师: Carol Sanford
开课单位: 信息不详。欢迎您在右侧留言补充。
开课时间: 2013-09-03
课程语种: 英语
中文简介:
这是一种糟糕的经营方式——消耗比你带来的更多的资源,出售你的资产,并烹饪书籍以使事情看起来好看。然而,卡罗尔·桑福德说,这正是人类在地球上生活的巨大事业的运作方式。正如桑福德所说,美国经营着一项特别不成功的“居住业”,占用的资源是其他任何国家的四倍。 桑福德发现,商业模式是思考可持续性问题的一种有用方式,尤其是因为改变企业行为将对能源和其他关键资源的消耗产生重大影响。她指出,目前正在努力应对可持续性的挑战,例如政府对旨在控制不同类型污染的行业的监管。一些公司甚至经历了“环境觉醒”,比如杜邦公司,该公司在一些最肮脏的企业(如从澳大利亚山区开采钛)中承诺保持中立。 但桑福德表示,满足监管要求和采取可持续的方法“达不到我们为地球所需要做的”。我们解决问题的头脑会把事情分解,寻求仅仅是“阻止混乱”或保护看似有价值的东西的方法。桑福德提供了一个这种思维方式的例子:佛罗里达州基西米河的“拉直”使农业更容易,这破坏了自然栖息地,污染了水,需要一个价值数十亿美元的修复项目。 我们需要进化到“完整心态”,这涉及到询问我们如何再生并带来更多我们需要的东西,而不降低现有的东西。实现这样的飞跃并不容易;这种新的思维方式没有“最佳实践”清单。桑福德说,我们需要“被一个隐喻所支配,这个隐喻说我们是一个不断发展和相互关联的系统的一部分”。木炭制造商Kingsford在哲学上进行了这样的转变,努力减少水、热和废物的账单。该公司不是简单地在不同的制造领域寻找效率,而是“研究了木炭砖的本质”,并找到了一种减少污染物、废物和能源消耗的新工艺。桑福德说,如果他们只追求可持续性,他们就永远不会创造出更好的产品,以更系统的方式解决问题,并为他们赢得更大的市场份额。 桑福德说,这种“更高层次的思维”最终意味着人类对自然的干预更多,而不是更少,但它将受到“万物如何从地球流到地球”的知识的影响。
课程简介: It’s a hell of a way to run a business -- consuming more resources than you bring in, selling off your assets, and cooking the books to make things look good. Yet, says Carol Sanford, that is precisely how humans are operating the vast enterprise of living on earth. The U.S. runs a particularly unsuccessful “Business of Inhabitation,” as Sanford calls it, taking up four times more resources than any other nation. Sanford finds the business model a useful way of thinking about issues of sustainability, not least because changing corporate behavior will have a large impact on consumption of energy and other critical resources. She notes current efforts to meet the challenges of sustainability, such as government regulation of industry intended to control different types of pollution. Some corporations have even undergone an “environmental awakening,” like DuPont, which in some of its dirtiest ventures (such as mining titanium from Australia’s mountains) has pledged to be neutral in impact. But meeting regulatory requirements and adopting a sustainable approach “fall short of what we need to do for the planet,” says Sanford. Our problem-solving minds break things down and seek ways merely “to arrest disorder” or protect what appears valuable. Sanford offers an example of this way of thinking: the ‘straightening’ of Florida’s Kissimmee River to make farming easier, which destroyed natural habitat, polluted water and necessitated a billion-dollar restoration project. We need an evolutionary leap into the “wholeness mindset,” which involves asking how we regenerate and bring in more of what we need without degrading what is already there. Making such a leap will not be easy; there is no “best practices” list for this new way of thinking. We need to be governed “by a metaphor that says we are part of a continuously evolving and interrelated system,” says Sanford. Kingsford, the charcoal maker, underwent such a transformation in philosophy, in its effort to reduce water, heat and waste bills. Rather than simply finding efficiencies in separate areas of manufacturing, the company “looked at the essence of the charcoal briquet,” and figured out a new process that reduced pollutants, waste and energy consumption. If they had pursued sustainability alone, says Sanford, they never would have created a better product that solved problems in a more systemic way, and also won them a bigger chunk of the market. This kind of “higher order thinking” will ultimately mean more human intervention in nature, not less, but it will be informed by knowledge of how “everything flows from earth to earth,” says Sanford.
关 键 词: 可持续性; 商业模式; 环境觉醒
课程来源: 视频讲座网
数据采集: 2023-11-23:liyq
最后编审: 2023-11-23:liyq
阅读次数: 18