|
Katrina后的计划：我们学到了什么到目前为止？
Planning After Katrina: What Have We Learned so Far? |
|
| |
| 课程网址: |
http://videolectures.net/mitworld_debate_katrina/
|
| 主讲教师: |
Jon Witten; J. Phillip Thompson; Stephen D. Villavaso; Susan Fainstein
|
| 开课单位: |
新奥尔良大学
|
| 开课时间: |
2012-08-07
|
| 课程语种: |
英语
|
| 中文简介: |
这个小组充满了沮丧和愤怒的气氛, 它审查了在卡特里娜飓风过后一年多之后新奥尔良恢复工作的进展情况。 灾难发生 2 0天后, 斯蒂芬·维拉瓦索回到家中去接他遗弃的猫。"我不认为新奥尔良当时是一个城市 … 没有通信系统, 没有基础设施, 没有饮用水, 没有排水, 没有政府, 没有地方可以得到食物。这是一个军事国家, "他现在正在重建自己的房子, 并深入参与更广泛的规划项目。维拉瓦索说, 问题是, "这个规划蛋糕" 有很多很多层. 有国家机构、市长委员会、市议会的努力 – "自上而下的规划、自下而上的规划、暴雪的规划."这 "有任何法律依据", 一线希望在于私人基金会试图建立一个统一的规划过程。然而, 这 "不是新奥尔良公民心目中的那种总体规划", 维拉瓦索说, 因为它没有为下一步的具体步骤制定蓝图。 菲利普·汤普森 (j. phillip thompson) 认为, "坦率地说, 在一个城市发生了100年来最大的全国灾难之后, 我们谈论的是洛克菲勒基金会提供的350万美元赠款, 这对团结在一起至关重要"规划一个大城市. "他将新奥尔良的情况置于更广泛的政治背景下, 即公众对城市资金的敌意。汤普森发现, "几乎没有隐藏将钱浪费在城市人口、穷人和不值得花在城市规划上的有色人身上的种族暗示." 因此, 城市规划的钱已经枯竭, 使新奥尔良处于一个特别脆弱的境地。社区参与 "在很大程度上是一个 ç 的外表", 因为真正包容的进程意味着接触广泛分散的新奥尔良人, 而这样的进程将 "极其昂贵"。更有可能被他人 "滥用和操纵"。最重要的是, 汤普森希望规划过程的目标超越住房和社会服务, 抓住 "打破贫困循环的好机会". 他想象教育和训练训练营, 以及将公民与工作联系起来的努力晋升的机会。 乔恩·威滕敦促人们对评估所有土地使用计划持怀疑态度, 而不仅仅是新奥尔良的土地使用计划。他说: "在没有全面规划计划的情况下, 土地开发导致无政府主义只惠及那些在重建中拥有既得利益的人。在新奥尔良, 规划必须避免唯一的来源承包商和精英委员会的组成。witten 对时髦的术语持谨慎态度, "这听起来是一件事, 但也许意味着另一件事." "" 新城市化 "和" 智能增长 "并不能保证智能设计的社区或避免蔓延,也必须努力 "尊重历史发展模式"。
|
| 课程简介: |
An air of frustration and anger pervades this panel, which examines the progress of recovery efforts in New Orleans a little more than a year after Hurricane Katrina. Stephen Villavaso returned to his home 20 days after the disaster to fetch his abandoned cat. “I don’t think New Orleans was a city at that point…There was no communication system, no infrastructure, no potable water, no drainage, no government, nowhere to get food. It was a military state.” He is rebuilding his house now, and is deeply involved in broader planning projects. Problem is, Villavaso says, there are many, many layers to “this planning cake.” There are state agencies, a mayoral commission, city council efforts – “top down planning, bottom up planning, a blizzard of planning.” But none of this “has any legal basis whatsoever.” A glimmer of hope lies in private foundation attempts to create a unified planning process. Yet this is “not the kind of master plan citizens of New Orleans have in mind,” says Villavaso, since it falls short of laying out a blueprint for concrete next steps. J. Philip Thompson finds it “frankly amazing, embarrassing and outrageous that after the largest national disaster in 100 years in a city that we’re talking about a $3.5 million grant from the Rockefeller Foundation as critical to pulling together planning for a major city.” He places New Orleans’ situation in a broader political context, one of public hostility toward urban funding. Thompson finds “barely concealed racial undertones of wasting money on an urban population, poor people, and people of color who don’t deserve it.” So money has dried up for city planning, leaving New Orleans in a particularly vulnerable spot. Community participation “is largely a façade,” since a genuinely inclusive process would mean reaching out to widely dispersed New Orleanians, and such a process would be “hugely expensive.” Those involved in planning may be vulnerable “to misrepresentation and manipulation” by others with greater means. Above all, Thompson wishes the planning process would aim beyond housing and social services, and seize on a “great opportunity to break the cycle of poverty.” He imagines education and training boot camps, and efforts to link citizens to jobs with opportunities for advancement. Jon Witten urges skepticism in evaluating all land use plans, not just those for recovery in New Orleans. “Land development in the absence of comprehensive planning programs results in anarchy benefiting only those with vested interests in rebuilding,” he says. In New Orleans, planning must avoid sole source contractors and the formation of elite committees. Witten is wary of trendy terminology “that sounds like one thing but perhaps means another.” “New urbanism” and “smart growth” don’t guarantee intelligently designed neighborhoods or avoidance of sprawl, and efforts must be made “to respect historical development patterns” as well.
|
| 关 键 词: |
城市规划; 重建; 社会
|
| 课程来源: |
视频讲座网
|
| 最后编审: |
2020-06-26：yumf
|
| 阅读次数: |
51
|
|
图 书 馆