高绩效工作体系、创新之路及其对创新生态系统的影响High Performance Work Systems, the High Road to Innovation and their impact on the Innovation Ecosystem |
|
课程网址: | http://videolectures.net/incogoesglobal2011_wallner_hpws/ |
主讲教师: | Thomas Wallner |
开课单位: | 上奥地利应用科学大学 |
开课时间: | 2011-05-11 |
课程语种: | 英语 |
中文简介: | 在制定经济发展政策或制定计划以从最近 - 或仍然普遍存在的全球经济危机中恢复时,创新仍然是关注的焦点(例如Wang 2009:1)。在这种背景下,近年来在该领域广泛讨论了创新生态系统的概念,使用了不同的范围,模型和观点。目前对创新生态系统的理解的特点是关注机构(Wessner,2007:xiii; Adner,2006),如公司,大学,投资者,政府及其紧密相连的互动。创新生态系统可以从各种角度描述,例如个体玩家(例如公司)(Adner,2006),或公共团体(例如国家)(Wessner,2007:68)。所提出的关键问题是,如何设计,建立和运营 - 在旁观者有利的创新生态系统的眼中。为了回答这些问题,通常采用线性或相当确定的方法(例如Adner和Kapoor,2010:309),尽管创新生态“系统”的概念本身就是矛盾的。社会文化方面被认为仅仅是影响创新活动的速度和方向的背景领域(Milbergs,2007:11)。它们不被视为可变因素,与创新生态系统相互作用并在其内部相互作用。相反,我们认为,必须整合这些方面,这些方面与创新过程没有直接关系,包括从各种创新活动引入区域社区和社会的反馈回路,再回到创新过程流。因此,创新生态系统的“生育力”既是一个整体区域的新兴品质,也是一个机构的协作安排(Adner,2006:1),前者不能被视为与后者隔离。我们的中期目标是为创新生态系统制定一个框架,其中包括这些反馈循环,并与“系统”特征相一致。在这种情况下,这些反馈循环之一可能与某个地区公司的高性能工作系统(HPWS)的实施有关。因此,我们的主要问题是:HPWS对一个地区的创新生态系统有影响吗?我们进行这项研究的动机来自观察,奥地利作为我们的祖国并不完全是你所谓的创新友好或拥抱变革。这是由德国工业联合会和德国电信基金会资助的“Innovationsindikator Deutschland 2009”的发现。该指数基于包括软因素在内的180个单独指标,并调查了经合组织中排名的17个主要发达国家。在整体排名中,奥地利位居第14位(Von Hirschhausen等人,2009年:7)。在社会创新气候类别中,奥地利在17个国家中排名最后(ebd。:109)。考虑到流程创新的重要性以及潜在的潜力,即新业务模型的设计或整个供应链的重建,这可能会在未来导致竞争劣势。价值创造的这些方面总是涉及公司的更大部分,通常跨越组织内部和外部世界的界限。在这里,整个组织或社会本身的创新文化成为创新进步和实质性变革的沃土。因此,问题出现了,如何培养创新生态系统动态中的这些新兴品质,其操纵躲避共同的确定性方法;如何促进这些品质的发展?有一些证据表明,HPWS可以为此做出贡献。 |
课程简介: | Innovation is still in the focus of attention when it comes to formulating policies for economic development or devise programs to recover from the recent – or still prevailing - global economic crisis (e.g. Wang 2009: 1). In this context the concept of innovation ecosystems has been discussed extensively in the field in recent years, using different scopes, models and perspectives. The current understanding of innovation ecosystems is characterized by a focus on institutions (Wessner, 2007: xiii; Adner, 2006) such as companies, universities, investors, governments and their tightly enmeshed interactions. An Innovation ecosystem can be described from various perspectives such as an individual player (e.g. a company) (Adner, 2006), or a public body (e.g. a nation) (Wessner, 2007: 68). The key questions asked are, how to design, build and operate a – in the eye of the beholder - favorable innovation ecosystem. To answer these questions often rather linear or rather deterministic approaches are adopted (e.g. Adner and Kapoor, 2010: 309), although the notion of an innovation eco”system” per se contradicts suchlike. Socio-cultural aspects are considered as mere contextual domains that influence the rate and direction of innovative activity (Milbergs, 2007: 11). They are not considered as a variable factor, interacting with and within the innovation eco system. On the contrary we argue, that also aspects have to be integrated , which are not directly related to innovation processes including feedback-loops which lead from all kinds of innovation activities into the regional communities and society and back again into the stream of innovation processes. Thus the “fertility” of an innovation ecosystem is as much an emerging quality of a region as a whole, as a collaborative arrangement of institutions (Adner, 2006: 1), and the former cannot be viewed isolated from the latter. Our medium term objective is to develop a framework for Innovation ecosystems, which includes these feedback loops and is consistent with the “systemic” characteristics. One of these feedback-loops in this context could be related to the implementation of High Performance Work Systems (HPWSs) in companies of a certain region. Thus our leading question here is: Do HPWSs have an impact on the innovation ecosystem of a region? Our motivation to do this research came from the observation, that Austria as our home-country was not exactly what you would call innovation friendly or embracing change. This was the finding of the “Innovationsindikator Deutschland 2009”, an extensive study funded by the Federation of German Industries and the Deutsche Telekom Foundation. This index is based on 180 individual indicators including soft factors and investigates the 17 leading developed countries as ranked in the OECD. In the overall ranking Austria is on the 14th position (Von Hirschhausen et.al.2009: 7). In the category societal innovation climate Austria is ranked last out of 17 nations (ebd.: 109) . Taking into consideration the importance of process innovation and the potential, which lies in the design of new business models or the reconstruction of entire supply chains, this may result in a competitive disadvantage in the future. These aspects of value creation always involve larger parts of a company, often crossing boundaries within the organization and to the outside world as well. Here, an innovative culture of the entire organization or of society itself becomes the fertile ground for innovative progress and substantial change. So the question arises, how can these emergent qualities in the dynamics of an innovation ecosystem, whose manipulation elude the common deterministic approach be fostered; how can the development of these qualities be facilitated? There is some evidence, that HPWSs can make a contribution to that. |
关 键 词: | 创新生态系统; 供应链; 价值创造 |
课程来源: | 视频讲座网 |
最后编审: | 2019-04-29:lxf |
阅读次数: | 88 |